Skin Care and Treatments of Melbourne Dermatology - The Evolution of Sunscreens

86,200+ expert documents for the skincare aficionado.

Home

Account Login/View Cart/Checkout

Perennial / Wisdoms

UV Exposure
Aging Skin and Mature Skin
Theories of Aging
Antioxidants
Sunscreens

Selected Skin Care

Avene
Dibi
Glytone
Heliocare
Kinerase
Kinerase PhotoFacials
Kinerase Pro+
La Roche Posay
MD Rx
Neostrata
OlosPrevage MD
RevaleSkin
Ti-Silc / Z-Silc
Tricomin
VitaMedica
Browse more brands.

Facial Skin Condition Treatments

Adult Acne
Dark Circles
Deep Wrinkles
Hyperpigmentation
Open Pores
Puffy Eyes
Rosacea

Body Skin Condition Treatments

Keratosis Pilaris

Skin Care Ingredients

Alpha Lipoic Acid
Arginine + Serine
Asiatic Acid
Blueberry
Caffeine
Capryloyl Salicylic Acid
Ceramides
Chlorogenic Acid
Chrysin
Coffee Berry
Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid
Mexoryl
Pro-Xylane
Silymarin
Sodium Laureth Sulfate/Sulphate
Browse more ingredients.

Clinical Procedures and Topics

Aging Skin
French Skin Care
Idebenone
Klein Becker
Oxidative Stress
Perricone
Skin Structure
Stem Cells
Healthy Skin Barrier Function
Smoking
Sun Protection
Topical Vitamin C/Firming
Choices and Needs
Strivectin

Browse more clinical skincare topics.


The Evolution of Sunscreens

Skin cancer is the number one cancer in mankind.

People at risk are primarily Caucasians but even dark skinned individuals have shown an increasing incidence of skin cancer.

There are three main reasons for this phenomenon.

The first can be traced to fair skinned Europeans colonizing areas of the world with higher ultraviolet exposure profile. Whether this is a move to areas that are closer to the equator, or areas that are higher in altitude, being fair skinned definitely predisposes one to a greater chance of skin cancer.

The second major cause is the increase in longevity. Modern medicine has extended the lives of our population and this coupled with many immune suppressive drugs used for arthritis and organ transplants, have led to an explosion of skin cancers.

The third causes the change in habits where bronzed skin is prized and people willingly expose themselves to more ultraviolet radiation in the form of sunbathing or tanning bed exposure.

Four generations ago, our great-grandmothers knew that wearing a bonnet or covering up with long sleeve clothing was vitally important.

They saw people in their communities whose noses, ears or cheeks were literally eaten away by skin cancer before the advent of good local anesthetics.

It's hard to imagine that one severe sunburn before the age of 18 doubles ones lifetime risk of skin cancer but this is unfortunately true. The time from exposure to the consequences of that exposure can be 50 or 60 years.

Recognition of the need to block the ultraviolet spectrum was made in the 1960's and 1970's. Late in the 1960's the first sunscreens appeared. They were crude and not very effective, however, improvements continued to be made. In the 1970's, the labeling of an SPF or sun protection factor was introduced in the United States.

This was then and is still today basically only the parameter to block a very narrow band of ultraviolet radiation, which is ultraviolet-B radiation.

This narrow band of ultraviolet radiation is 290 nanometers to 320 nanometers.

Unfortunately, it is not just ultraviolet-B that caused damage and the evolution of skin cancer.

Early in the 1980's, using mouse studies, it was shown that ultraviolet-B range light is the initiator for most skin cancers. Less notice was taken that the same time it was discovered that ultraviolet-A or those rays between 320 nanometers and 360 nanometers are cancer promoters whereas these were initially studies performed on laboratory mice.

This has been confirmed clinically by the increasing incidence of squamous cell cancer relative to basal cell cancer over the last 50 years. Numerous studies document the increased number of squamous cancers induced in patients receiving ultraviolet-A light for psoriasis (PUVA treatment).

In the 1990's Australia reported that there was a higher incidence of malignant melanoma in persons who use sunscreens when matched to persons who didn't use them. Unfortunately, this was interpreted by the popular press that sunscreens are not needed or might actually cause skin cancer.

Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Many of these sunscreens contained weak ultraviolet-A blockers that are ineffective. Unfortunately there is no numbering system for UVA blockers. Evidence is mounting that the higher incidence of melanoma as well as squamous cell cancers is due to ultraviolet-A exposure.

The 1990's saw improved ultraviolet-A blocker with the introduction of a more effective blocker Parsol. Physicians recommended Parsol to be used by their photosensitive patients, especially patients with diseases such as lupus. Unfortunately, this still was not a very good solution.

It was not until the middle of the 1990's when ultramicronized zinc and titanium oxide was incorporated in many sunscreens.

Unfortunately, these products containing zinc oxide and titanium oxide are still not as cosmetically acceptable as the formulations that do not contain then.

It is also more difficult and less cosmetically acceptable to produce sunscreen that is waterproof or sweat proof but this is highly desirable for people who engage in outdoor activities. This ability to withstand wash off or sweat off is known as substantivity.

Australia is the melanoma and skin cancer capital of the world. This is due to the fact that it was predominately colonized by very fair Brits, Scots and Irish. Different countries have different parameters for defining sunscreen as being waterproof.

The US has a rather lax standard, which is that the ultraviolet-B blocking effectiveness is tested after 30 minutes in standing water.

The Australian standard is far more rigorous and sunscreens must demonstrate their ability to prevent wash off or sweat off after two hours of rapidly moving water.

It is for this reason that American made sunscreens are not sold in Australia.

Our antiquated method of labeling sunscreen measured only by an SPF value is no longer in the best interest of persons who use sunscreen and lulls us into a false sense of security.

The Food and Drug Administration in the United States has not yet revised this standard although the American Academy of Dermatology has urged them to do this for many years.

This policy is probably not in the best interest of Americans as some more reasonable system needs to be adopted, which recognizes the detrimental effects of ultraviolet-A light as a cancer promoter.

Manufacturers of popular sunscreens without zinc or titanium dioxide are not likely to incorporate effective ultraviolet-A blockers until there is either a public outcry or a change in the standards by the Food and Drug Administration.

Chasing the highest number on your sunscreen can no longer be relied upon as a measure of safety.

When possible, persons in the spring, summer and fall should avoid sun activities during the peak hours of sun exposure and those are 10am to 1pm standard time or 11am to 3pm daylight savings time.

Waterproof sunscreens with an SPF of 15 or greater, containing either zinc oxide or titanium oxide should be applied liberally before the body is overheated or water exposure by at least 20 minutes so that they may bind to the skin.

Persons should also wear a hat and cover as much of the body as is reasonable for the planned activity.

Currently the most substantive sunscreen with the broadest range of ultraviolet blocking activity I have been able to find to BLUE LIZARD sunscreen, manufactured by Del-Ray Dermatologicals.

This is the sunscreen which both my family and I use daily.

We encourage our patients to also use this sunscreen.

Related Skin Care Information, Products and Expert Discussions

Safety Concerns Over High-Tech (Nanotechnology) Sunscreens

Safety of Micronized Zinc Sunscreens

Obagi Medical Products Presents In Vitro Data Showing Its Topical Vitamin C Serums Provide Greater Absorption and Stability Than a Leading Competitor

On The Winter Solstice - Think Summer Sun Protection

A Review of Hamilton Sunscreens


Blue Lizard :

Blue Lizard Anti-Aging (Antioxidant) Face SPF 30 : Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen SPF 30 — Regular : Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen SPF 30 — Sport : Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen SPF 30 — Sensitive : Blue Lizard Australian Sunscreen SPF 30 — Baby : Sunscreens and Blue Light Sensitivity : The Evolution of Sunscreens : In-Vitro Sunscreen Performance Evaluations : Video: Blue Lizard on WJHL 11 - Tri Cities #1 : Video: Blue Lizard on WJHL 11 - Tri Cities #2 : Video: Bottle Changes Color — Blue Lizard on the Rachael Ray TV Show : Video: Blue Lizard on ABC News (20/20) : Video: Blue Lizard — Dr. Kenneth Macknett : Video: Blue Lizard on the Ellen TV Show :


New/Notable 2016

Open Pores — Treatment and Prevention

MD Rx Melbourne Dermatology Open Pores Overnight Solution

The Sun

Radiation

Mexoryl

Pentapeptides Ineffective

Asiaticoside vs. Madecassoside for Collagen Synthesis

La Roche-Posay Redermic

Valeant Pharmaceuticals

Rainbow

Telomerase

Azelaic Acid

Bisabolol

Avena Sativa

Panthenol

Aster Family of Plants

Green Tea (Camellia Sinensis) Extract

Polyphenols

Caffeine

Oxofulleram

Salicylic Acid

Capryloyl Salicylic Acid

Open Pores

Phytosphingosine

Glycerin

Idebenone

Ascorbyl Palmitate

Kojic Acid

Algorithm for Optimal Sustained Exfoliation: Glycolic Acid

Comparison of 33 Sunscreens