Ok. I bought Strivectin-SD because my 81-year old Mother has been using it for years, and her skin is a living testament that this product must work! It absorbs into the skin like butter, and then you apply your regular moisturizer/night-cream over it.
My skin feels and looks better already; just luminous! My Mothers' skin looks even better. So why all the negative publicity? This stuff really works! I love it.
Do you have anything positive to say about this product at all??
The complaint made here, by unbiased media outlets and government agencies, is with its fraudulent presentation and the repeat criminal, illegal and unethical conduct of its manufacturers.
Strivectin is neither a treatment for stretch marks nor an alternative (or comparable) to Botox.
A rudimentary analysis of its ingredients gives away the game in an instant.
Strivectin is just another relatively ordinary moisturizer — an emollient substance designed to help trap water in the epidermis, and soften superficial dead skin cells.
The product's makers have not perchance stumbled upon some extraordinarily versatile and indispensable fountain of youth.
Skin care products like Strivectin answer the call of women for whom solutions to aging must be found in a single tube, no matter what reality dictates.
The success of products like Strivectin is testament to the fundamental inability of the "skin care" segment of the beauty industry to act in accordance with bona fide knowledge of the skin, and outside of blind commercial concerns, to deliver on the outcomes they promote as attainable.
Strivectin is a waffle maker — briefly popular, but ultimately relegated to the back of the cupboard.