The utter uselessness of Strivectin in treating stretch marks and wrinkles should by now be evident, if it wasn't obvious from the outset.
The criminality of some of its makers and the fraud of its "medical endorsement" have also been fairly well publicized.
Yet each business day we receive around 10 inquiries from individuals wishing to purchase it, as soon as possible, in person or by mail over the phone!
Amazingly, most of these people have read at least some of the Strivectin review and analysis.
They have some idea of the cost of using it as directed, and sometimes even that its formulation mirrors that of the more modest, and cheaper, Olay Total Effects.
For the skincare user whose needs are dictated by trends and advertising, there can be no permanent material improvements, and ultimately therefore only deterioration over time.
It seems Strivectin could have been Melbourne Dermatology's "best seller" in skincare for home use.
Be it through the personality of our directors or the most rudimentary of professionalism, the absence of this and similar products from our practice is a relief and boon for all concerned.
The recommendation of all that is Strivectinesque would require no end in bare faced lies.
Peter Wilson.
Advisor — Melbourne.